As I read and watch the crazies who vehemently supported Proposition 8, the most overwhelming reasoning is that we must ban same-sex marriage for the sake of the children. Because kids with two dads or two moms will have "dysfunctional" upbringing. Well here are some of the Prop 8 campaign commercials... do you think these kids are being used (the young ones)?
To put such a cozy and innocent spin on a Proposition of Hate just seems wrong... this girl surely has no idea of what she is really doing... hopefully she'll look back in disgust of her parents:
I was going to let the Mormons get by this time without mention, but when I found out they used a theme song from the show LOST to put as the background of a loony Prop 8 commercial (loony because of the scripture... and because the LDS Church believes in magic underwear... and a man in the sky) I just had to rip on them:
Oh please, your scriptures are silly. And by the way, marriage was around long before religion was... and it's been changing throughout history. Religious people don't have a monopoly on social concerns of others, and they should have no say on state constitutions.
And to think, in England, it's actually an embarrassment for politicians to speak about their religion. Why? Because them Europeans actually understand that religion is insane!
PS: where's that black dude we just elected?
Showing posts with label civil rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label civil rights. Show all posts
Monday, November 17, 2008
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Wise Words
Dante once said that the hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in a period of moral crisis, maintain their neutrality.
-JFK
You're afraid of making mistakes. Don't be. Mistakes can be profited by. Man, when I was young I shoved my ignorance in people's faces. They beat me with sticks. By the time I was forty my blunt instrument had been honed to a fine cutting point for me. If you hide your ignorance, no one will hit you and you'll never learn.
-Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451
The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.
-MLK
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
About Prop 8...
Those of you who read my 11/6 post know how revolutionary I believe the election of Obama is for
Why is it that the United States rejoiced in the glory of breaking such a monumental race barrier, yet largely ignored the passing of Proposition 8--the ballot initiative, which called for the banning of gay marriage in California? Furthermore, where was Barack Obama to promote this basic civil liberties cause? He could have reached out to those black and Hispanic communities that voted overwhelmingly for Prop 8--but he didn't. Obama should not be blamed, but he should have been there.
Not only did the most progressive state in the union vote against the rights of an entire people, but so did Florida, Arizona, and Arkansas. In fact, Arkansas banned gays from adopting! But what conclusions can be drawn from these staggering civil rights defeats? I am confident that the day will come when gay marriage is legalized once again (perhaps sooner rather than later), but it is quite clear that the nation is still overwhelmingly homophobic, and too many gays are fearful of advocating for their own cause (the No On Prop 8 campaign rarely even used the word).
What is good about Prop 8 is that it has sparked a bit of a national dialogue--not a very big one, but significant nonetheless. Protests in California are growing, and outrage amongst many prominent people in the straight community are voicing their opposition (see Keith Olbermann). The campaign against Prop 8 was poorly organized and largely ineffective in many communities (particularly black and Hispanic ones). But the proposition has also exposed another dastardly foe to civil rights: organized religion.
What organization provided the most support for Prop 8? The Mormon Church, of course. Perhaps the most discriminated religion in American history (the ironic part) has disregarded the plight of fellow human beings, and ensured the passing of this mandate of intolerance (providing nearly half of the funds). Organized religion claims they must protect the "sanctity of marriage," but we must remember that this "sanctity" once prohibited inter-racial marriage. It should be clear who is on the wrong side of this issue.
So what is the big deal about marriage exactly? Do gay people really "deserve to be miserable like the rest of us" (Bill Maher)? Well this issue really is not about "marriage" per se. It is about taking away the freedoms of people who are different. The ferocious campaign to take away given rights ought to disgust any decent person--and the hateful "Pro-8" celebrations that took place should be condemned by our society. But in the words of Kevin Sessums: "Race has always—up until this point—trumped sexual orientation as a socially accepted civil rights issue." This, I believe, will be a turning point of the LGBT rights movement--when the word "gay" entered the national conversation of civil liberties.
So what is the big deal about marriage exactly? Do gay people really "deserve to be miserable like the rest of us" (Bill Maher)? Well this issue really is not about "marriage" per se. It is about taking away the freedoms of people who are different. The ferocious campaign to take away given rights ought to disgust any decent person--and the hateful "Pro-8" celebrations that took place should be condemned by our society. But in the words of Kevin Sessums: "Race has always—up until this point—trumped sexual orientation as a socially accepted civil rights issue." This, I believe, will be a turning point of the LGBT rights movement--when the word "gay" entered the national conversation of civil liberties.
I heard Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (an opponent of Prop 8) say that the "people of Cali-forn-i-a have spoken"--that this is the nature of democracy, and the will of the majority. Well, is our court system not designed to protect the interests of minorities? If we operated under mob rule, how many millions would be disenfranchised? In this instance, it will be up to the courts to re-establish that majorities cannot determine the limitations of liberty upon minorities. Example: Brown v. Board of Education (the controversial ruling to desegregate schools).
But in closing, I have a question for those who believe in equality: are you a true advocate for the cause? To the minorities who have suffered throughout history, but have gained significantly in the past 50 years: do you feel no responsibility to stand with your brothers and sisters in their own quest for the Dream? Who are we to sanction freedom? Who are we to treat others as lesser beasts who must adhere to the law of religion and prejudice? I do not believe that I have been a good enough an advocate, but now is the time to endure... to pursue what is right and noble; for we must come together for the pursuit of happiness of all.
Do not be afraid. Be human.
But in closing, I have a question for those who believe in equality: are you a true advocate for the cause? To the minorities who have suffered throughout history, but have gained significantly in the past 50 years: do you feel no responsibility to stand with your brothers and sisters in their own quest for the Dream? Who are we to sanction freedom? Who are we to treat others as lesser beasts who must adhere to the law of religion and prejudice? I do not believe that I have been a good enough an advocate, but now is the time to endure... to pursue what is right and noble; for we must come together for the pursuit of happiness of all.
Do not be afraid. Be human.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)